Re: Pro-choicers must be anti-tax, no?
No it does not seem analogous at all, as you have no theory demonstrating who owns what. Put differently, you haven't shown why self-ownership leads to world-ownership, or how much world-ownership people should have or how they are allowed to legitimately come to own the external world.
BTW-I think that is an awful argument against abortion anyway. How could threatening somebody be worse than killing somebody? The general argument used by pro-choicers is: fetus is not a human being yet.
|