[_JerryD_]

Yeah yeah, blah blah blah. Everybody knows already that 50k is not a big enough sample size, we are all clear minded, smart individuals and can draw our own conclusions was the sample size whatever it is.. Right?

It's so ridiculous to come here and say something like 100k is the limit and only after that you can make assumptions about winrates.

There are assumptions that can be made from 15K, 50K, 100K, 200K and 500K hands. Obviously the more the hands the better the conclusions. I'm sorry if I offended somebody with my mere 55 000 hands. I thought wrongfully that people can interpret the stats theirselves without a disclaimer: this sample is too smart for any accurate winrate stats. I have more but merging takes time and databases are spread to different computers, of course my overall ptBB is smaller, that was just to show how I've played at iPoker the last couple of months and that with nittish style u can make profit too.