What pisses me off the most is that, if he had intercourse with the 15 year old, he would have received a far lighter penalty, but oral sex gets him 10 years.
[ QUOTE ]
The 17-year old was not seen on tape consenting, and prosecutors stuck by the rape charge in that case on the basis of their allegation that she was too intoxicated to consent, ie, unable to consent.
[/ QUOTE ]
Incorrect.
"I mean it wasn't even an hour," said jury forewoman Marie Manigault. "We immediately saw the tape for what it was. We went back and saw it again and saw what actually happened and everybody immediately said not guilty."
link
I took exception to your incredulity at his rape aquital and your statement "the video shows him screwing a girl while shes practically knocked out unconscious and unable to consent."
The video is precisely what acquitted him of the rape charge. I think we can all at least agree that he was overly punished, severely.