Re: Probably a Disappointment
[ QUOTE ]
They are an independant third party. They can report back what they were shown and what they were denied access to.
[/ QUOTE ]I can see how you can claim 2+2 is trustworthy, but as they've done quite a bit of business with AP "independent" just isn't true. Especially as clear evidence of cheating would be pretty bad for 2+2 indirectly.
The incentives there are for 2+2 clearly biases them to prefer this thing being fairly small. You may argue that they're above being influenced by that, but clearly there interests isn't served well by blowing the lid of a gigantic cheating scandal from someone they have done a lot of business with.
Someone truly independent wouldn't be depending on the poker industry for their income. Unfortunately that excludes most people willing to bother, so we should probably just look at someone who is known for having impeccable character. Barry G anyone?
|