Thread: Tricky play sir
View Single Post
  #16  
Old 10-27-2007, 01:13 PM
mustmuck mustmuck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 457
Default Re: Tricky play sir

[ QUOTE ]
In the actual hand I was villain and held 99. I was pretty sure utg was 2+2 and that he had no read on me based on the first orbit. I was kinda like 'eh it's 2/4 he probably can't read hands' and figured he would give me credit as an unknown. I wouldn't have done this at higher stakes tho.

Good bluff/bad bluff?

[/ QUOTE ]

This is the sort of situation that I'm not too sure about vs an unknown. It's pretty obvious that the AQ hand has one pair here the vast majority of the time. I just don't know if I give the "bluffer" credit for realizing this. I would have folded but it could be wrong against an unknown that clearly isn't fishy. A lot of people want to call. I think I like the tricky enough to do this with a set then he's tricky enough to bluff here theory.
Reply With Quote