Re: F AP
moar good stuff in the regs:
268. An employee, whether a key person or not, of an Authorised Client
Provider must not take part in an authorised game if directly involved in
functions related to the conduct of the game.
although 242 could be a loophole to the 5-year recordkeeping rule if they have/can forge the right documents.
The Commission may, by written notice given to a an Authorised Client
Provider:
(a) approve a place (the “approved place”) nominated by the
Authorised Client Provider as a place for keeping the Authorised
Client Provider’s gaming records;
(b) specify a gaming record of the Authorised Client Provider (an
“exempt gaming record”) that is not required to be kept at the
approved place;
(c) specify a gaming record of the Authorised Client Provider that
may be kept temporarily at a place other than the approved
place, and the period for which, or the circumstances in which,
the record may be kept at the other place;
(d) approve the keeping of information contained in a gaming record
in a way different from the way the information was kept when
the record was being used by the Authorised Client Provider; or
(e) approve the destruction of a gaming record the Commission
considers need not be kept.
|