[LuckyMux]

Nat,

I meant 'in what format'? Is it just a transcript? And is it dated?

The obvious point being, 'how can we possibly know that conversation is authentic and unedited?'

It's from Mark Seif, ffs. The only court on Earth that would accept that as reliable evidence is in Guantanemo Bay.

The upshot is: no hand histories. The rest is merely sound and fury, signifying nothing.

And legal threats again? Oh, dear. I think Dan is the one who can be talking to m'learned friends here, not Mr Seif. 'LIAR', he called him if I recall correctly. In capitals, no less.

I urge you to go back to the beginning and retrace this affair step by step, imagining Mark Seif is 100% innocent of any wrongdoing as you do so.

Then try it again but, this time, imagine Mr Seif is up to his neck in it from day one.

See which scenario you think best fits the evidence.

I have.