View Single Post
  #50  
Old 10-24-2007, 07:05 PM
KEW KEW is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,883
Default Re: FTP Answers 10/24

[ QUOTE ]
No Bad Beat Jackpot EVER!

And upping the max # of tables was not a good idea, at least not for cash games. It's already tough to find decent tables at limits as low as 100nl because of all the grinders. Not to mention that there are a handful of current 12 tablers who frequently sit out on all 12 tables.

Edit: I guess one thing that could help alleviate at least the last part of the above is booting players off of tables if they miss 2 orbits rather than the current system which doesn't boot anyone unless there is a waitlist.

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree with this I think allowing even 12 tables is too many much less an increase to 16 tables..IMO casual players do not want to see the same players on ALL the tables..12-16 cash tables is to many..If a player can play that many tables let them do it on 2 or more different sites..Many casual player view these players as either shills and/or bots(or other computer aided playing)..Not to mention that the presence of a few "mega multi tabler" really has an adverse effect on game quality..

There is more to the issue then simply maximizing the rake..
Reply With Quote