View Single Post
  #32  
Old 10-23-2007, 01:51 PM
Kos13 Kos13 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Purdue
Posts: 2,118
Default Re: Case for South Florida and Virginia over USC, Oregon and Oklahoma?

[ QUOTE ]
You have every reason to believe that there is no chance in hell that USC can "run the table" and yet you're talking about them as a NC contender.

[/ QUOTE ]

They are a NC contender. If they run the table, they're in the argument...that makes them a contender. If you don't think it's possible for them to do so, you must not realize how loaded the team is. As the USC guy said, they've been hurt. Do I think they'll run the table? Probably not. Do I think they can? Without a doubt, yes.

Also, to the OSU people: yeah, you scheduled Texas. That's great, but you didn't schedule them this year. Your schedule is an absolute cakewalk THIS YEAR. Yeah, I'm impressed you scheduled Texas and USC this decade. But FOR 2007, your schedule is incredibly weak. That's all I'm saying.

And yes, I watched most of the Michigan State game, and I realize they didn't scrape by. I know they were in control the whole way, I'm just saying that MSU actually had a (very slim) shot at the end of the game...that's all.
Reply With Quote