[rand]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
even vs a nit seems like an easy call, right? nits dont have a 2 and ther is only 1 combo of 22.

for 88 to not be the best hand either...
1. he flopped quads
2. he didnt repop 99, and is c/r a boat on a dry-ish board
3. decided to call OOP w/ a 9 and is now checkraising

seems like a standard call to me. id be able to lay your hand on some turns/bets, but not on the flop.

[/ QUOTE ]

Rob- Yes, I mean my first line of thinking when I have an aggro image is like "wow his range is so polarized to FD, air, highcards here and Im only behind 99, 22 lets get it in" but the thing is- he never bluffs. so what do we do when nits have a polarized range towards the nuts but there's only a few combos of nuts. Do we go bayesian logic and stack off or psychological logic and fold AA here? I really have trouble in spots like this.

[/ QUOTE ]

So i get Bayes and i get psychology but i dont quite understand your use of them here

onto the hand...seeing as how we are on the turn but there is no turn card i cant see the turn changing much so i guess you gotta call again...