[Clayton]

As an outside observer I think a very important aspect of this that is still unclear is to the relevance of [censored]'s owing the money. Was he deceptive at all?

I will help friends in hard times and expect the same if I hit sucky times, but if the honesty between friends is breached, then I am more likely in disagreement with By-Tor.

However, if this is one of those deals where [censored] needed help and didnt set a timeframe on money owed back, then vanished, I agree w/ By-Tor.

Its all about honesty and trust, and the parameters set around the money owed are imo the only relevant facts here when arguing over whether Dids was right or not. Did [censored] lie? Deceive? If not, then leave it alone.