[yukoncpa]

I found this post quite interesting. Does no one wish to talk about it? At the very least, using this judge's logic, these fellows should also be charged with attempted murder, because they had sex with her ( forcibly ) without protection. Even if they all tested negative for HIV, gonorrhea, syphilis, etc., they inflicted unnecessary suffering on her by making her wonder if she were inflicted with one of these diseases or if she were pregnant. So in addition to armed robbery, certainly, some additional crime was committed against this woman, regardless of if she were a whore. If a thief broke into my property, held me at gun point, robbed me, then released a gas bomb, that caused my body incalculable damage, then the release of that gas bomb should certainly be a further serious crime committed against me, over and above armed robbery. Or perhaps the judge is correct in the criminal aspect of the case, and the woman should sue the culprits civilly for further damage.