[jafeather]

[ QUOTE ]
My Credibility is not at stake here

[/ QUOTE ]

I never said it was. I was meaning that you have to have some level of credibility for others to have any initial faith in your claim. Without you providing your piece of "evidence" why would anyone want to look into what you say?

[ QUOTE ]
But consistant patterns do not equate to variance...

[/ QUOTE ]

um....over 10 tourneys, yeah...it almost EXACTLY equals variance...

[ QUOTE ]
OMG..THE MATH IN POKER....MY HEAD WILL EXPLODE.....Dude there's only 52 cards in the deck....don't make it out to the equivalent of solving Fermat's Last Theorem...

[/ QUOTE ]

I am not exaggerating the math in poker to be some grand unsolvable equation. Nor should you simplify it to a level so elementary where 10 tourneys can in any way be considered proof of a long-term pattern. (especially since you won't even cough up 10 HHs to begin analysis of your "theory")


[ QUOTE ]
Why the [censored] is this thread still unlocked?!?!?!?!?!

[/ QUOTE ]