Thread: Theory
View Single Post
  #35  
Old 10-18-2007, 03:33 PM
Claunchy Claunchy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: smart HAG
Posts: 5,182
Default Re: Theory

[ QUOTE ]
claunch,
why? i doubt our ranges will be so narrowed and face up when we check. plenty of regs will also bluff to a check in rr-ed pots. plus, we shouldnt be betting 100% of the time anyways.

[/ QUOTE ]
Well, yeah, checking is fine sometimes as long as you c/f a fair amount of the time when you miss.

I just saw more than one response that had the default action of c-betting every flop they miss and checking when they hit, which is just dumb.

Something vaguely close to a good frequency would be c/f the missed hands like 40% or so (more often on non-A-hi flops imo), c-betting the other 60%. Mostly c/cing Ax, occassionally b/cing against a trickier/more aggro reg. Almost always leading with 88.

Also, what ikes said, it's totally possible/often-preferable to call and do something postflop to win the hand.
Reply With Quote