View Single Post
  #169  
Old 10-18-2007, 10:33 AM
HatesLosing HatesLosing is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 153
Default Re: Updated Cliff Notes On Absolute Poker Scandal (18th October)

Usually when a marketing/PR guy says something along the lines of "...a lot of information out there is COMPLETELY FALSE and slanderous", but then won't tell you what they're referring to, it's because it's inconsequential things they are referring to (like a one-liner from some moron that no one here takes seriously anyway), but they want you to THINK that they're referring to something that's very important.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Two items from the phone conversation:

"Not all of the information posted on 2+2 is incorrect, but a lot of it is completely wrong."

"Some people are using this opportunity to spread misinformation and trying to hurt Absolute Poker. A lot of really untrue things are being said on purpose to make us look bad."

These claims have made me wonder. The evidence of cheating is repeatedly claimed to be convincing in these threads. Are these convictions based on belief that the reported Excel-file is genuine?

[/ QUOTE ]
Also, I get the feeling that when AP says "a lot of it is completely wrong" they're talking about something like, oh, Scott Tom doesn't work for us. People on 2p2 are claiming he does.


[/ QUOTE ]