[oliverm]

sorry - repost in new thread...

I'm pretty sure this scenario has not yet been raised...

We know that AP logs all tables and hands, and these logs contain everyone's hands etc.
We also know that this is accessible and exportable as we have these details in an xls file.

What about the possibility that the perpertrator also has access to the logs and was accessing these as they were written?
Presumably a manual query of the log server would take too long (and tedious) and they were employing an automated method, using account 363 as a second login to identify the current table and handnumber (as per Poker Ace Hud/Poker Tracker) before executing the log lookup?

Note, this theory doesn't change the facts discovered surrounding the accounts used. But it would explain AP's insistence that there is no possible way for a super user to exist? And why they have continued to deny this even in the face of an audit that would presumably uncover this if it were possible?