[duracell]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
People laugh at Clark but the NFC East is really a lot better than the rest of the conference. Pack should be higher (I think them and TB is a tossup) but otherwise the 4 NFC East teams are all top 8.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think that some people are forgetting that if it weren't for some terrible luck, the Eagles would have beat the Packers. They got outplayed by Washington, plain and simple. Obviously they looked terrible in the Giants loss, but that was much more a product of injuries than anything else. I'm not trying to claim they are at the top of the conference or will compete with Dallas, but to claim that they aren't top 6 is just wrong in my opinion. They have one true loss on the season.

[/ QUOTE ]

And you guys wonder why I get on Eagles fans all the time. LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL at "1 true loss." The Redskins were missing THEIR ENTIRE OFFENSIVE LINE on Sunday...was that not a true loss?

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm not saying that they don't have three losses, or that they should have four wins. I'm just saying that a lot of people look at the 2-3 record and say "LOL the Eagles aren't good." I'm saying you have to take into account why they lost those games. They were missing five starters against the Giants. Four of those guys will be starting next week, and should be starting the rest of the way through the season. I think you took the words "true loss" too literally, dude.