[ikestoys]

[ QUOTE ]
absolute proof isn't the point. Yes, it's possible tom is not potripper. It's *possible* no cheating has occured.

We know it is etremely, extremely likely that cheating did occur. We know it is very likely Tom is a guilty party. We know it is extremely, extremely likely that Sief is: a poker player, has met Tom, and is friends with Tom.

Given this knowledge, it makes it *more* likely that Sief is guilty of his accused cheating, than it was before we had this knowledge.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is easily explained by coincidence, the potripper HHs and Doubledrag stats are not so easily dismissed. you have no direct evidence that Seif cheated, we do have concrete evidence that POTRIPPER cheated.

Stop trying to make a round peg fit in a square hole, you have nothing, zilch, nada on seif