View Single Post
  #663  
Old 10-15-2007, 05:03 PM
1p0kerboy 1p0kerboy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: 492k
Posts: 6,026
Default Re: Professional No-Limit Hold \'em Volume 1 Review Thread

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Specifically, you agree that he loses money on the play of the hand because he put 10% of his money in with 66 against his range.

[/ QUOTE ]

Altogether the preflop play by the button in this particular hand is -EV because we have kings.

But his call of the 3-bet with a pair is still +EV IMO if he's set-mining and/or he figures to play better than us postflop.

[/ QUOTE ]

Our range is mostly hands like this, so most of the time that this happens it is globally -EV. So, it will tend to follow that this is globally going to be -EV.

You took out the part where I said the call of the 3-bet is +EV. I have never disputed this and I have said that it is +EV multiple times.

[/ QUOTE ]

Actually the call of the 3bet might not be +EV. It depends on how well the button plays post flop. But it can be.

I don't understand why we need to look at everything "globally". To me that gives us less knowledge and information about the hand than considering all of the actions.
Reply With Quote