[-moe-]

[ QUOTE ]
Wouldn't a better way of rebutting them be to have THEM pick a sample of n hands from hand histories and bet them a large amount of money that the hands, grouped by percentages, stay true to their percentages (within a certain confidence interval) over that n number of hands?

[/ QUOTE ]

Umm... this is exactly what I suggested in my original post.

Perhaps I was too verbose and not expressing myself clear enough.