Re: Is Poker Playing a better test for would be presidents?
I agree and that is what I was trying to say.
If you are advocating a 'poker test' for candidates, then how can you score it? When top players can disagree about the optimal stretegy at any point?
Chess is a game of finite information, and in being so, can be a method of measuring ones decision making process within it. Not so in poker. Or at least it's not as cut and dried.
What method of implication are you advocating for your trial?
|