[RIIT]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Ummmm.... .no?

[/ QUOTE ]
no what?

[/ QUOTE ]
"No" to your analysis method, specifically what you're doing to determine Guaran's hand range. Sorry for the confusion.

Your "QM analysis" method looks really wrong from both a poker and quantum mechanics point of view. I'm pretty good with both of those subjects, actually. This is a joke, right? I mean, you can't be serious people are doing this sort of analysis and attempting to use the results to program poker bots. The reason this method isn't discussed in books is because it makes no sense and produces useless and wrong answers.

[/ QUOTE ]

Slim,

Sorry to burst your bubble here, but some of the best bots on the planet do this very thing.

However, in all cases, accurate intel as to opponent hand ranges will yield better numbers (I've always believe this) so no argument there.

But what we're probably talking about here is a level 4 bot that does not use any information beyond the current hand (we'd have to hear from Asbak to know this for sure) and even if it did, there's only 17 hands in the history which isn't a huge precedent to understand what Guaran's range is. So what's this type of bot to do?

RIIT