Re: 2007PBWC NLH FinalTable - Bot mistake? or misfortune?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Ok, I get what u were saying before. Using the names screwed me up, I though u were talking about the two involved in the hand.
[ QUOTE ]
Also, there was 19 in the pot (not 17) ... your bad
[/ QUOTE ]
I believe there is 18? I thought villain was in the BB, but he's not, he's in the SB. So there is the 6 from the button raise, the 10 from the SB min raise and 2 from the BB. So, 18...
[/ QUOTE ]
Nope. The pot is 19. PPro HH's explicitly state player spends only (i.e. the atomic amounts that transact from stack to wager).
According to the HH, the spends were 1 2 6 10. Our discussion here is a good example of why it does this - to know with certainty how much was in the pot at any given line in the HH (you just add up the spends).
RIIT
[/ QUOTE ]
This is why we convert the HH to be readable. It said he raised 10. That made me think he raised to 10. As I have it figured now, he actually raised to 11. 10 above the 1 he put in the SB. However, his raise was actually 5, he called 5 and then raised another 5.
|