[cheburashka]

I dunno, Barry

As I understand it, a squeeze play depends on the following reasoning from your two villains: Raising Villain1 thinks, "Hmmm, if I call the re-raise from BB, I might get re-raised again by Villain2, who must have a pretty strong hand to have called my raise. So I can't control the pot and I should get out unless I'm willing to commit here." And Villain2 must think, "Hmmm, I was OK calling a raiser, but not 3-bet, therefore I'm probably in trouble against a BB re-raise." According to Harrington, BTW, it also depends on the squeezer having an image that is tighter than that of the original raiser.

So my question is: given your descriptions of villains in other posts, do you think these villains are capable of making the reasoning required to fold to your squeeze?