Re: The Fate of #756 by Marc Ecko
[ QUOTE ]
What he has "gaps" in is his standards, not his critical thinking. And we might be better off saying it is YOU who has a gap in his standards.
[/ QUOTE ]
The quote is not mine, but attributed to the Pulitzer panel. It would be their standards applied in determining that the book cannot be viewed as factual, not mine. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
An objective source had access to all the author's notes and other details used in writing the book, they did extensive research to determine the investigative and journalistic merits of the piece in consideration for award....
....and they came out of it with the opinion that the book could not be viewed as factual.
Oops...
|