Re: Nightmare on Elm Street for the Dems
[ QUOTE ]
I agree that 2008 is up for grabs. I think the Republicans will make a big mistake if Rudy is the nominee. Any dividend they might be able to reap from Clintongate will be negated because of Rudy's own personal history. And if there are people who won't vote for a woman, there are also people who won't vote for someone named Giuliani. I can see Hillary winning some up-for-grab states that she wouldn't against somebody else--Florida, West Virginia, Ohio.
Romney would be a much more viable candidate for the Republicans, it seems to me.
[/ QUOTE ]
You must be kidding. You equate an anti-Italian vote to the anti-woman vote? Especially a woman who is so shrill and divisive? And then on top of it you say Romney...a Mormon (read "cult", "polygamy", "Warren Jeffs"...is more viable on the bias scale?
I agree Romney is a better candidate on the issues than Rudy, but he has no chance.
|