Thomas Friedman had a great op-ed today related to this subject...
[ QUOTE ]
...since 9/11, we’ve become “The United States of Fighting Terrorism.” Times columnists are not allowed to endorse candidates, but there’s no rule against saying who will not get my vote: I will not vote for any candidate running on 9/11. We don’t need another president of 9/11. We need a president for 9/12. I will only vote for the 9/12 candidate.
What does that mean? This: 9/11 has made us stupid. I honor, and weep for, all those murdered on that day. But our reaction to 9/11 — mine included — has knocked America completely out of balance, and it is time to get things right again.
It is not that I thought we had new enemies that day and now I don’t. Yes, in the wake of 9/11, we need new precautions, new barriers. But we also need our old habits and sense of openness. For me, the candidate of 9/12 is the one who will not only understand who our enemies are, but who we are.
[/ QUOTE ]
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/30/opinio...amp;oref=slogin
Seeing the frothing at the mouth for another war by many on this forum (even a preemptive nuclear war), I think Friedman's point is spot on: 9/11 has made people stupid(er).