[stackingboxes]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
someone save me from being a BR nit please. if i can beat 2/4 and 3/6 over a decent sample (~100k hands), can i be a winner at 5/10?

[/ QUOTE ]

100k hands isnt a very big sample, but i dont see any problem with taking some shots at 5/10 if you're bankrolled for it. although as pethie said, its impossible for anyone to answer whether you can be a winner at 5/10. for all we know you're not even a winning player at 3/6 and you have just been running well over 100k hands.

edit: fwiw from my limited experience 5/10 is a fair bit tougher than 3/6. but u can find decent games if you table select well.

[/ QUOTE ]
of course its impossible to predict whether i could be winning up there, all i wanted to know whas how those limits play compared to each other. prolly poorly put into words, i know.
also: do you know my SN or was that comment on my 3/6 winnings supposed to express that you cannot know?

[/ QUOTE ]

sort of in the same position. What's u'r winrate at 2/4 and 3/6 and over how many hands?

I find that every level of game is its own beast. And u have to adjust in order to be a winner. if u don't adjust fast enough, u'll prob break even or be a loser.