View Single Post
  #9  
Old 09-27-2007, 01:01 PM
Tuds75 Tuds75 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 494
Default Re: Jermain Taylor vs. Kell Pavlik 9-29

[ QUOTE ]


For example, Don King > Bob Arum, Felix Trinidad decision over De La Hoya.


[/ QUOTE ]

For one thing Don King > Bob Arum maybe in the early '90s, but at this point Arum was definately top dog promoter-wise. The reason Oscar lost is he decided to fight the final few rounds trying not to lose instead of winning, I still think Oscar won the fight, but all he needed to do was keep doing what he was doing and he would have won. But hi-jack his thread with Oscar/Tito talk from '99.

You mention if the fights go to the cards, Taylor will win because DiBella is a powerful man, well Pavlik's promoter is Bob Arum. In the pecking order of promoters, Arum is ahead of DiBella. If it goes to the judges and it's a come victory either way it won't be on the promoter's pull that gets their fighter the decision. The reason their could be a deputed decision is because Taylor will control the fight with his jab and Pavlik will land the bigger punches. So it will depend on what the judges are scoring.

Tuds
Reply With Quote