[petu]

If we are excluding 180s then we should exclude every tournament where there is 180 or less entrants and ftp has a lot of them. Also 180s don't score you that many points if we have only top 10 scores count.
Example: You get 309 points if you win a 20/180. If you come first in 20$ tournament with 1100 entrants you score 764 points. Even 6. place there scores more points than winning a 180. And 2 20/180 wins doesn't score as many points as winning the bigger tourney. And the guy who wins the bigger tournament has a slot more to use in his top ten scores.

But if you guys really think we should have different tier to tournaments with under 180 entrants i see no reason to deny it. It just means more work for whitecolumn or anyone who keeps the score.

edit: and imo two thing which separate 180s from huge fields is that there is less variance and you can put more volume to them.