[pzhon]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I like your examples, but I'm not sure why you linked that blog entry, which was from a (debatable) legal perspective that ignored the scientific issues.



[/ QUOTE ] If you read the whole blog, you would see that these lawyers and scientists were indeed debating the scientific issues. The specific quote I provided that you said, "I like your examples" was from the blog and it was very scientific. I gave these examples because I remembered them when studying the court case, and I didn't wish to plagerize from this blog.

[/ QUOTE ]
Oh, you are referring to the pages and pages of comments on that blog entry as "the whole blog." Normally, "blog" refers to what the person wrote in that entry and others, not the spam or comments refuting what the blog's author wrote. Many of those comments were not made by lawyers or scientists, by the way.

I don't believe the blog's author read the entire judgement, or understands the science, and most of the comments were worthless.