Re: Absolute Cheating
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
ehm skip those kind of religious sounding nonsense please and explain me why 2+2 wants to believe
[/ QUOTE ]
sorry, I just don't know where to start.
OK, lets see. Nobody want to hear that the winning stats is not very suspicious at all. In fact, those stats are expected if we look in a very large dataset (all high stakes poker hands the last couple of years) with very high variance (it has been suggested that this villain plays a style that has a SD of 270PTBB/100 estimated from observed data) Instead, people wants to believe that these stats has a 1:10^20 probability.
why? People wants to believe he cheated.
[/ QUOTE ]
Are you:
[ ] Stupid
[ ] Forgetful
[ ] Trolling
[ ] A shill
[ ] All of the above?
We've been over this. The 10^20 IS NOT WIN RATE. It is how often he could be expected to play perfectly with an infinite river aggression.
Plus there is a whole bunch of other very suspicious evidence on top of that.
I'd ban you for a week if I was a mod. In any case, I'm not responding to you any more, and I suggest nobody else does either.
|