[threads13]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I would tend to think that his range is wide until he has proven he will think on multiple levels.
I think a range of like 66+/AT+/KJ+ would be reasonable. That is pretty wide, but he could be doing this with SC's and lower PP's too so it gives you an idea.

So, it is just a matter of putting this range in poker stove and seeing how you do against it. You need a number higher than about 47%. I would tend to make the call here, but it probably is pretty close either way.

[/ QUOTE ]

lol

you should probably spend some time with pokerstove

[/ QUOTE ]

Oh bottomset, you are always such a sweetheart.

We all could use some more time with pokerstove, so sure.

Since you put so much time and effort into that post, like you always do, why don't you try to add something useful by showing me the exact percentages and, therefore, show how off I am? That would exponentially mean more to me than your previous post.

[/ QUOTE ]

well I figured it would be intuitive that vs a range mostly composed of hands you dominate/flip with, you'd have a clear call, you are in bad shape vs 3combos AA(12%), 3combos KK(34%) and 47% vs QQ-66(42combos), 74% vs AQ-AT,KQ-KJ(60combos), 51.6% vs AK(12combos)

guess not

you have 60% equity vs that range, which is a clear call

[/ QUOTE ]

Fair enough.

I didn't even get that far in thinking about it after I read your post as it put me on the defense.

[i]Edit: FWIW, I was thinking our equity was around 50%-55%. That is all I meant by close.