[Antinome]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
You only beat 88,99, and a bluff(AQ, AJ, A8, A9). While his range includes those hands, it includes too many hands that beat you. AT, K9-KA, TT+. Unless I've seen him bluff before, this one I let go. I 'put' him on TT.

[/ QUOTE ]his 3 bet range is MUCH larger then this. he has 3 bet me 4 times in 30 hands. so either he is gettin hit in the face with the deck or he 3 bets light. prolly the latter obv

[/ QUOTE ]

Kaz, that range I proposed lines up with exactly 14% of the deck, which is the same as 4/30 = 13.3%. Of course, over this sample he could be running good, running bad, w/e. The rational thing to do is assume he 3bets exactly as often as it seems he 3bets.

That isn't the only 14% 3bet range, of course.... mine would look more like ... 44+,AJs+,KJs+,QTs+,J9s+,T7s+,97s+,86s+,75s+,65s,AQ o+,KQo. But the original one is more popular with most villains, since it values high cards more.