[fraac]

[ QUOTE ]
My guess is that when you play the "patterns" you are doing the same thing as the "levels" of thinking is explaining, it's just that you don't articulate it very clearly, and therefore others can't emmulate your methods without either watching you play, or taking lots of time to build up first-hand experience.

[/ QUOTE ]
Good guess, that's what I said half a thread ago.

Maybe a pole is in order. Who thinks in levels versus thinking in patterns. Unfortunately I don't care.

Note that a weak process you can explain well isn't superior to a strong, more abstract process. This failing is evident in much of Sklansky's writing.