Re: Game Theory Resolution
[ QUOTE ]
There isn't a need for the SB to change from his optimal strategy either, since whatever he loses as SB he will gain as BB.
[/ QUOTE ]
Yeah. There was some thought buried somewhere about how it *might* be worthwhile to try to get the BB to play sub-optimally and then exploit that, but the more I think about it, the less sense it makes. There's no reason for him to play sub-optimally, and the only thing you can do to try to get him to play a wider range is by playing a wider range yourself. But while you're doing that, even if he doesn't adjust, he's not as well off as he *could* be, but he's still better off than he was before you opened up, and it's going to be fairly obvious when you re-adjust to try to exploit.
So yeah, I guess there's really no third-level thinking involved here at all.
What a silly, silly game. I'm sure glad we have poker instead.
[img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
|