[metsandfinsfan]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
and as far as me agreeing to the rotating mayor idea amongst the group, ldo

[/ QUOTE ]

honestly, this is a really bad idea for you guys

and im not saying that just because im in the game, but because it really will cause the people not in your group to to gang up you

[/ QUOTE ]

ok so lets say zurvan is mayor and eliminates someone.
then, the 8+ people that voted zurvan can either:
1 - vote zurvan again
2 - vote another of the 8 people that voted him
3 - turn on zurvan and vote for someone else

zurvan saying he wants to rotate mayor does not really affect anything except for maybe give security to the people who voted him ... but you wanting to start an anti-alliance (which worked wonderfully in +/- iirc) will probably have the same effect as it did in +/-