Re: Win rate with optimal strategy against limit raise bot
What I don't understand is why we are talking in vague term like "makes it _harder_ to make a profitable laydown." The bot from OP is 100% predictable so we can talk in numbers. I assume we have all the time and computing power in the world for every street decision against this bot.
And I am wondering why we are talking about "fold with as low as 10.1%" after I demonstrated that by 4-betting the flop there is no card on turn or river which would make folding the best option.
If the argument is: "By just calling flop you can make FOLDING the best option on turn or river" then I ask: Isn't it in our best interest to not ever make folding the best option?
I still don't know what "winning hot and cold" means.
|