[Waingro]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
you are more then priced in to get it in asap.

[/ QUOTE ]

Let's see your maths here.

[/ QUOTE ]
How about you read my post again and tell me what part was unclear to you. You realize we are 25% vs a set right? Based on the action I find it very very hard to put villain exclusively on a set but the majority of his range is hands like KQ, AQ, KK, AA and maybe even worse. Hands that we have much better equity against.

Edit: And this villain is much much looser, I think he can show up with stuff like QT, KT, 9T etc etc. You get my point?

[/ QUOTE ]

I said nothing about not understanding your post or being in agreement or disagreement with your recommendation. All you keep talking about is equity vs ranges and have said nothing about pot or implied odds.

[/ QUOTE ]
Ok, now I see your question. I mentioned in that post we need 36% equity when called, 14.1(our bet)/38.95(the size of the pot).