[tpir]

[ QUOTE ]
Firstly, no one ever called gays "perversions". I was talking about the act - and that society shouldn't recognize it or put it on par with male-female marriage - and shouldn't have to if they don't want to.

[/ QUOTE ]
So you are saying homosexuality is a perversion but homosexuals aren't perverts? Good one.

A large part of society didn't want black people to be able to vote or use the same schools. I don't think it needs to be explained why they weren't allowed to do this even though they wanted to. What is the difference? Oh, right, the gays are choosing to pop boners over something that everyone else finds repulsive. Homosexuality sounds like the biggest conspiracy theory in the history of the universe by your definition.


[ QUOTE ]
homosexual couples are free to contract in any other way they see fit.

[/ QUOTE ]
But those contracts won't be legally recognized. Are you opposed to civil unions? I don't think anyone will care if they don't get to use the apparently magical "marriage" term.


[ QUOTE ]
I will stay out of these threads in future, so enjoy your one sided viewpoint and "vigorous debate".

[/ QUOTE ]
Looks like you learned something from NotReady after all.