[nath]

[ QUOTE ]
Hand 87: seemed like a weird squeeze spot.

[/ QUOTE ]
Looks pretty good to me. The stacks are ideal for it, as well as a caller who has enough chips to play looser than he should PF for a small bet, but not a big one.
[ QUOTE ]
Hand 192: is your opponent the reason you played this so passive OOP?

[/ QUOTE ]
I think passively is the most profitable way to play this, since getting paid off by worse hands is hard. Maybe I could just bet/call it and hope for the best, but I think the mid pairs (which he should have) shut down when the ace flops if I bet it.
[ QUOTE ]
Hand 229: reasoning for overbet?

[/ QUOTE ]
Well, I'm not folding, and I don't want them to call.
[ QUOTE ]
Hand 238: getting a good price?

[/ QUOTE ]
Yeah, this is easy math vs. someone who could be pushing almost anything.
[ QUOTE ]
Hand 317: why no repop vs. this laggy guy?

[/ QUOTE ]
Getting 4-bet kinda blows, even though obviously I call, I don't want to race my way out of here when everyone else is so much shorter and I'm better than the field. Plus, he doesn't fold enough-- I can't make him go away nearly often enough preflop or when I miss the flop. I promise you if I make it 125k and bet 175k on the flop he turbo calls both bets with the hand he had.