[pvn]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
This is totally moving goal posts. I don't have to move into an existing barber shop to compete with an established barber.

[/ QUOTE ] What are you talking about? You said your barber does not use force to maintain territorial monopoly. The way I understand that term that is exactly what he does. Maybe I misunderstand what territorial monopoly means, though?

[/ QUOTE ]

If I live at location X, I am not restricted to Barber X. If I want to use Barber Y instead of Barber X, I do not have to move from Barber X's turf and into Barber Y's turf.

[ QUOTE ]
Ok. So you want whoever owns the land to have the power that government has now. That might be better or worse or the same, but do you really think that it is the only way to have a "consistant moral system"? That is really ridiculous.

[/ QUOTE ]

Like I said, I'm open to other possibilities.