[Legislurker]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
More than a few people in Washington initially dismissed as absurd the idea that the trade organization could claim jurisdiction over something as basic as a country's own policies toward gambling. Various states and the federal government, after all, have been deeply engaged for decades in where and when to allow casinos, Indian gambling halls, race tracks, lotteries and the like to operate.

But a WTO panel ruled against the United States in 2004, and an appellate body upheld that decision one year later. In March, the organization upheld that ruling for a second time and declared Washington out of compliance with its rules. That has placed the United States in a quandary, said John Jackson, a professor at Georgetown University Law Center who specializes in international trade law.

[/ QUOTE ]

these two paragraphs suck.

they left out the part about why the WTO ruled as they did. it's sort of in there later but people will form an impression (that the case is "absurd"), especially since this comes early in the story.

[/ QUOTE ]

That is one reason why it gets so little coverage. I was talking to a guy who teaches an MBA course and he barely understood the whole process. The NYTimes doesn't have the best business talent going. Nor does USAToday. Ive written
WSJ, The Economist(and FT), and Bloomberg asking for some better coverage, but no results yet. Im the most disappointed in the lack of coverage from The Economist as they have the qualified staff to research it well, and they covered UIGEA favorably for us.