[Disconnected]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
One small (but important, IMO) amendment which is they could still not be getting odds to call, and you'd still rather have them fold than call due to their equity, and your potential reverse implied odds. At least, I think what that AA example in the book is driving at.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't think that's the point of the AA example. I think it's rather to show how devestation of a mistake it is to build a large pot and then fold.

[/ QUOTE ]

I stand corrected....was at work. I looked this up again, and agree with you. I was remembering the part about where they said while it was good to get it all in preflop with aces, it was even better to get most of it in, then have your opponent fold. Doesn't really change the rest of my rambling in the other post, but you are correct that our opponent in this example made a devastating mistake building the pot then folding for just a little more.