[THAY3R]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
The key part you're missing is that the issue is that Schilling asserted as fact that Bonds admitted to taking steroids, among other things, which he didn't.

Kind of like how you originally asserted that Bonds admitted as much was fact, when it isn't. [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Then in that case, the case will hinge, at least partly, on whether Bonds' testimony to the grean jury constitutes an admission of steroid use.

Which, of course, is what we spent 500 posts arguing about in the other thread.

So like I said, could be interesting.

[/ QUOTE ]

I know you didn't actually pay attention to that thread, you just responded to every post with your undeniable facts, but you do realize that they have tried Bonds like a billion times and still havn't even gotten an indictment right?