[permafrost]

[ QUOTE ]
This is why the Plaintiffs in the ACLU v. Gonzales, who engage in conduct X in states where it is legal to so act have standing to sue to block a Federal law which rests on conduct X being illegal in other States.


[/ QUOTE ]
How can they sue to block a Fed law that does not apply to their state legal business? Or are you saying it does apply; if so, why would it apply?

[ QUOTE ]
You are dead wrong that no one was injured if Party or Doyles Room left because of the Act becoming law.

[/ QUOTE ]
They knew they were involved in unlawful internet gambling, I assume. They saw a chance to skeedaddle; did that cause injury or save injury? Either way, their business decision; sue them if you think you are injured due to their closing a long-time unlawful business.