Re: Useful legal analogy re Internet versus other \"legal\" gambling
I have read the pleadings of the iMEGA. I am not sure that they directly make this argument. However, I think that they imply it because one of their arguments is that the UIGEA is not narrowly tailored to satisfy a legitimate government objective and thus is too broad. In other words, what is rational about the UIGEA?
Isn't that the same basis for the judge's ruling in the case that you describe, Milton?
|