[ QUOTE ]
Neutral compared to a scholarly journal.
For example, when I clicked on the link, the first thing I noticed in bold letters was the phrase, "Jesus - the imaginary friend". This phrase implies the site is not neutral, i.e. they aren't interested in an honest investigation. I'm sure it's fun to read though and good for a few chuckles, so knock yourself out.
You could also compare its neutrality to a fundie site claiming to have disproven evolution. Those sites are clearly not neutral. Since
www.jesusneverexisted.com is about equivalent in neutrality, it is safe to say that neither website is neutral.
[/ QUOTE ]
Like I said:
[ QUOTE ]
JNE provides sources just about everywhere. Good luck with the investigation.
[/ QUOTE ]
FWIW, I couldn't care less about 'scholarly' or not. There is a lot of crap coming out of the 'scientific' community, and it's always better to make up your own mind.