[reup]

so you're in favor of a top tier strategy to narrow the field. a point against the argument that a more in-depth view of the characters is needed/has-not-been-exposed is that through CNN, and other media sources online, an interested intelligible follower will have been able to form a deeper view of each candidate; the counterpoint being not many people are that interested, or possibly intellible at getting to the root differences between the candidates... most people have a snapshot view, oh I like him he said this.

So who would decide this, is there a national poll to see who are the top 3-4 candidates? why couldn't this be part of the political process? Just because historically the long shots don't recover the ground they lack they can be smite-ed-ed?