View Single Post
  #47  
Old 07-12-2007, 12:52 PM
permafrost permafrost is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 618
Default Re: Worrisome possible quote from iMEGA

[ QUOTE ]
I am perplexed by the failure to name any members of the iMEGA. I thought that this was needed to prove standing. Maybe they intend to provide this information in a sealed document to the court. Their documents suggest this necessity because their members fear prosecution.



[/ QUOTE ]

Help me here.

If the member's businesses are lawful then UIGEA doesn't apply to them, where's the problem?

If the member's businesses are unlawful, then why is UIGEA's added penalty for that unlawfulness unconstitutional? Or are they saying all gambling laws are unconstitutional?
Reply With Quote